Dr. King

In 1963, later on a protest in Birmingham calling attention to the need for competent make ups for African Americans, the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther pouf Jr. wrote an open letter to the spinal fusion of Christian ministers in the American S egressh. Dr. ability found himself the subject of primitive criticism from his fellow clergymen for his protest, specifically the illegality of the protest. In his es maintain, Dr. King attempts to appeal to the ethical, ablaze and logical sides of countrymen to show them that the laws that he was brea queer were unfair and unfair in and of themselves. This paper testament critically examine the appeals that Dr. King made and the strong point of those appeals.Dr. King begins his argument in favor of his bring throughs with an appeal to the ethical considerations of his audience. Since I feel that you ar men of genuine good will and that your criticisms are sincerely set forth, I want to try to answer your story in what I hope will be patient and sensitive terms, (King 1963). He begins by telling his audience that he respects their motives and hopes that they will respect his.This is an important part of the ethical argument in that King wants immediately to establish that this was not a rash action and that he is not defending himself lightly. Next, he seeks to establish his own credentials and his mightily to be in Birmingham. King mentions that the great unwashed in Birmingham have complained of his advance in as an outsider and he immediately wants to clarify that he was invited in.I have the honor of serving as president of the Confederate Christian Leadership Conference, an organization operating in every southerly state, with headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia. We have some eighty five affiliated organizations across the atomic number 16, and one of them is the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights. often we share staff, educational and financial resources with our affiliates.Several months ago the affiliate here(predicate) in Birmingham asked us to be on call to engage in a nonviolent direct action program if such were deemed necessary. We readily consented, and when the minute of arc came we lived up to our promise. So I, along with several members of my staff, am here because I was invited here. I am here because I have organizational ties here (King 1963)By first establishing that his organization has ties in Birmingham and that he was invited, King dismisses the idea that he is just an outside rebel rouser. After establishing his right to be there, king establishes the authority under which his ethical decisions will be made. Just as the prophets of the eighth century B.C. left their villages and carried their thus saith the Lord far beyond the boundaries of their home towns, and just as the Apostle Paul left his village of Tarsus and carried the credo of Jesus Christ to the far corners of the Greco Roman world, so am I compel lead to carry the gospel of freedom b eyond my own home town, (King 1963). King calls to mind the ethical standard by which he wants to be judged the book of account and his faith. Finally, King argues why his action is ethically justified.Moreover, I am awake(predicate) of the interrelatedness of all communities and states. I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham. damage some(prenominal)where is a threat to justice everywhere, (King 1963). With this argument he points out the ethical concern that most directly led to the Birmingham protest, injustice.King also appeals to the emotions of his audience. Then, finish September, came the opportunity to talk with leaders of Birminghams economic community. In the course of the negotiations, veritable promises were made by the merchantsfor example, to remove the stores humiliating racial signs. (King 1963). He begins by gently reminding them of the racial humiliation that was an integral part of the South at the time. Next, h e moves onto the violence that the average African American in the South had witness or heard. And finally, he moves on to the emotional appeal of children, onwards turning the emotionally-charged words filled with hatred and familiar to all gray pitch blacknesses.But when you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and submerge your sisters and brothers at whim when you have seen hate filled policemen curse, kick and level(p) kill your black brothers and sisterswhen you suddenly find your tongue twisted and your language stammering as you seek to explain to your six year old girlfriend why she cant go to the public amusement park that has just been advertize on television, and see tears welling up in her eyes when she is told that Funtown is closed to colored children, and see ominous clouds of inferiority beginning to form in her little mental sky, and see her beginning to distort her personality by developing an unconscious bitterness toward white p eople when you have to look upon an answer for a five year old son who is petition Daddy, why do white people treat colored people so mean? when your first name becomes nigger, your middle name becomes boy (however old you are) and your last name becomes John, and your wife and mother are never given the respected title Mrs. (King 1963)Throughout the essay, king also appeals to the logic of his audience. First, he points out that Southern blacks had attempted to sue the system, just that the system excluded them from it and thence they could not change the system from within. Then, King begins to use statistics to back up his arguments, beginning first with the sheer lack of black voters in the South. An unjust law is a code that a numerical or actor majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. This is difference made legal. By the same token, a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow and that it is willing to fol low itself. This is sameness made legal. Let me give another explanation.A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that, as a result of being denied the right to vote, had no part in enacting or devising the law. Who can say that the legislature of Alabama which set up that states segregation laws was democratically elective? Throughout Alabama all sorts of devious methods are used to disallow Negroes from becoming registered voters, and there are some counties in which, even though Negroes constitute a majority of the population, not a single Negro is registered. (King 1963). King also argues that unjust laws or just laws which are unjustly enforced must be changed and that people should take whatever action is reasonable to change them. By providing specific examples, he makes it hard for any logical person to disagree.Though Kings I have a dream speech is more famous than his Letter From a Birmingham poky, it is in this essay that he sets the tone for the entire civil rights movement. In his use of emotional appeal, he moves beyond sheer anger to the dismay and pain caused by segregation. His logical arguments are made soundly so that opponents cannot argue that he is simply hot-headed or breaking the law for the rice beer of personal gain. However, perhaps the most important and effective of his arguments come in his ethical arguments. When King illustrates gently, but with great strength, the unethical behavior that has led to the crisis in the South, he is non-accusatory and simply states how things ought to be. This above all else is what marks the immenseness of this essay.